• Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • CCPA
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
Monday, February 6, 2023
Harris County News Online
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Technology
    • Crytpocurrency
    • Gaming
    • Gadgets
  • Sports
  • Health
  • General
    • Business Services
  • Travel
  • Press Releases
  • Popular
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Technology
    • Crytpocurrency
    • Gaming
    • Gadgets
  • Sports
  • Health
  • General
    • Business Services
  • Travel
  • Press Releases
  • Popular
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Donald Trump News

Trump Attorney Testifies In Trial Over Alaska Oath Keeper’s Eligibility … – Anchorage Daily News

trump-attorney-testifies-in-trial-over-alaska-oath-keeper’s-eligibility-…-–-anchorage-daily-news
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
David Eastman, Joe Miller, Oath Keepers, Palmer, court, courtroom, trial

Wasilla Rep. David Eastman, right, confers with his lawyer Joe Mille. (Loren Holmes / ADN)

PALMER — An attorney behind former President Donald Trump’s elaborate plan to subvert the results of the 2020 election testified Tuesday in a trial over the eligibility of an Alaska lawmaker to hold public office.

Trump attorney John Eastman testified a day after the U.S. House Jan. 6 committee recommended federal criminal charges against him for obstructing an act of Congress and conspiracy to defraud the U.S.

At the center of the trial is whether Wasilla Republican Rep. David Eastman is eligible to hold office in Alaska given the state constitution’s disloyalty clause, which bars a person from holding public office if they are a member of a group that advocates the violent overthrow of the U.S. government.

There is no family connection between David Eastman and John Eastman.

David Eastman maintains he is a member of the Oath Keepers, a right-wing group whose leader has been convicted of seditious conspiracy in connection with the events of Jan. 6, 2021.

[Jan. 6 committee recommends charges against former Trump adviser John Eastman]

The lawsuit against David Eastman was brought by Wasilla resident Randall Kowalke, who says the Oath Keepers advocate the violent overthrow of the U.S. government and therefore Eastman should be barred from office despite winning reelection to his state House seat in November.

David Eastman has declined to disavow his membership in the group, and his attorney Joe Miller has argued that the Oath Keepers as a group does not advocate the violent overthrow of government, even though some of its members have been convicted or pled guilty of an attempt to illegally halt the transfer of power to current President Joe Biden.

Rudilph Giuliani, John Eastman

In this Jan. 6, 2021, file photo, Chapman University law professor John Eastman stands at left as former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani speaks in Washington at a rally in support of President Donald Trump, called the “Save America Rally.” The law professor who spoke during President Donald Trump. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

John Eastman, a conservative legal scholar who advised Trump after he lost the 2020 election, testified Tuesday that membership in Oath Keepers is protected under First Amendment protections of freedom of association, even if the group called for overthrowing the government. In addition to testifying as a legal expert on David Eastman’s behalf, John Eastman said Tuesday that he had also been retained by David Eastman to work on the case, including drafting legal pleadings.

“Mere advocacy, including advocacy to overthrow the government or the necessity of overthrowing the government is constitutionally protected speech unless it crosses the line to imminent incitement to imminent lawless action,” said John Eastman, who testified through a remote video stream in the trail that took place in Palmer. He went on to testify that many of the statements made by the leader of the Oath Keeper that appeared to call for using force to stop the certification of the 2020 presidential election did not constitute “incitement to imminent lawless action.”

John Eastman argued that even if some members of the Oath Keepers had incited imminent lawless action, that would not impact the entirety of the Oath Keepers membership — extending to David Eastman

“It would violate the First Amendment protection for freedom of association to attribute that to other members of the organization who were not participants in that,” said John Eastman.

NFPCWL3ZWBDQJAA2M63LM2Q4C4

In this image from video released by the House Select Committee, John Eastman, left, a lawyer for former President Donald Trump, appears during a video deposition to the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol at the hearing June 16, 2022, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (House Select Committee via AP)

John Eastman is the attorney behind the unfounded legal theory that former Vice President Mike Pence could reject or delay the certification of state electors. The congressional Jan. 6 committee recommended Monday that John Eastman and Trump face federal criminal charges in connection with the plot to stop the transfer of power after the 2020 presidential election won by Biden. But it is up to the U.S. Department of Justice to determine whether or not to press charges against them.

Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes, who was convicted of seditious conspiracy in connection with the events of Jan. 6, also testified in David Eastman’s trial.

Goriune Dudukgian, an attorney for Kowalke, has returned throughout the trial to statements made by Rhodes before the Jan. 6 insurrection and his conviction as indications the Oath Keepers — a group Rhodes founded — has advocated overthrowing the government.

David Eastman testified during the trial that he was in Washington, D.C. on Jan. 6, 2021, but did not enter or approach the Capitol. He also testified that he urged members of Alaska’s congressional delegation to vote against certifying the election results.

Anchorage Superior Court Judge Jack McKenna is set to decide whether David Eastman can retain his seat in the Legislature after closing arguments in the case are heard on Wednesday, following six days of testimony. Regardless of the outcome, parties have indicated the case will likely be appealed to the state Supreme Court.

Harris County News Online

© 2021 Harris County News Online

Navigate Site

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • CCPA
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • DMCA Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • CCPA
  • Terms of Use

© 2021 Harris County News Online

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT